October
See it in 30 minutes
AI assistance & insights · October People

Less starting over.
More getting somewhere.

Get help preparing a conversation, drafting a goal or finding the next action. October’s AI assistance lives inside people workflows with role-based access and human review.

Useful assistance, with the context attached.
October AI · Inside the work

A useful place to start.

Help me prepare for my next 1:1 with Naledi.

Example AI response

Start with the person, then the goal. Naledi’s product work gives you a useful opening for a conversation about leading the next discovery initiative.

Current product goalPrevious 1:1 actionDevelopment direction
A suggested next step

Discuss a small discovery initiative Naledi could lead this month.

Illustrative responses · Review suggestions before taking action

Explained
every flight-risk score lists its contributing factors and confidence
Suggested
in calibration and promotions, AI drafts and checks while people decide
Daily
manager nudges for 1:1 gaps, recognition gaps and meeting load
Switchable
AI features can be turned off for your organisation

Who it’s for

The signals are in your data. Nobody has time to find them.

October’s AI is most useful where people already make decisions. These are the moments we built it for.

HR business partners

One person supporting four hundred employees across several teams.

The need

“I find out someone was unhappy when they hand in their resignation.”

How October helps

Flight-risk predictions combine tenure, pay, performance, manager changes, 1:1s, recognition and leave. Higher scores create follow-up actions for the manager or HR.

Busy managers

Eight direct reports and back-to-back meetings.

The need

“I walk into 1:1s with nothing prepared and leave without notes.”

How October helps

1:1 prep briefs pull together goals, previous actions and recent feedback. Recaps capture what was agreed, and nudges flag who hasn’t had a 1:1 or recognition lately.

Talent review leads

Calibration across managers who rate very differently.

The need

“A rating depends more on who your manager is than on what you did.”

How October helps

A fairness check reviews each calibration session for manager consistency, outliers and demographic patterns, and suggests rating adjustments with the evidence.

People leaders and finance

Planning next year’s headcount and hiring budget.

The need

“How many people will we lose next year, and where?”

How October helps

Attrition forecasts start from your own history, adjust for current flight risk and add retirement projections, so the plan reflects the organisation as it is today.

Why people data goes unused

Reports describe last quarter. Decisions happen this week.

TodayRetention risk is a gut feeling, or an exit interview after the fact.

With OctoberFlight-risk scores with contributing factors, and suggested next steps such as a stay interview or a pay review.

TodayManagers prepare for 1:1s by scrolling back through old notes, if at all.

With OctoberA prep brief and talking points arrive before the meeting, with open actions carried forward.

TodayCalibration bias is spotted by whoever happens to be in the room.

With OctoberEvery session can be checked for manager consistency, outliers and demographic patterns.

TodayPromotion cases are judged on how well they’re written.

With OctoberAI flags vague or unsupported claims and missing evidence, so cases are judged on the work.

AI in the work

Spot it sooner. Decide on the evidence.

Four places where October’s AI turns people data into something a person can act on. Each one shows its reasoning and leaves the decision with you.

Retention signals

See who might leave, and why.

Flight-risk predictions score each employee from 0 to 100 using tenure, compensation, performance, manager changes, 1:1s, recognition and leave. Each score lists the factors behind it, sorted by impact, with a confidence level.

  • Low, medium, high and critical risk
  • Contributing factors with weights
  • Stay interviews, pay reviews and manager alerts
Platform team · Flight riskIllustrative example
Thandi M.Senior Engineer · 3 yrs
High68
Luca B.Engineer · 11 months
Medium52
Nomsa A.Engineering Lead · 6 yrs
Low21
Why Thandi scores 68
Below market payCompa-ratio at 86%High
Stagnant compensationNo raise in 22 monthsHigh
Recent manager changeManager changed 4 months agoMedium
No recognitionNone received in 6 monthsLow
Manager alertStay interviewDue in 14 days
Confidence 78%, based on how complete Thandi’s data is.

Forecasting

Plan for the departures you can see coming.

Attrition forecasts project monthly departures from your own history, then adjust for the number of people currently at high flight risk. Tenure bands and retirement projections show where the losses are likely to come from.

  • Twelve-month attrition forecast
  • Flight-risk adjustment on top of history
  • Tenure bands and retirement projections
Attrition forecast · Next 12 monthsWhole organisation
14.2%Annualised attrition
9High flight risk
486Current headcount
Expected from historyFlight-risk adjustment
By tenure

Most departures in the last year came from people in their first two years. Retirement projections add 3 expected exits next year.

Fair decisions

A second look at every calibration.

Before ratings are final, a fairness check reviews the session. It looks for managers who rate consistently high or low, ratings that don’t match the evidence and demographic patterns, and suggests adjustments for the panel to discuss.

  • Manager consistency and outliers
  • Demographic pattern check
  • Rating suggestions grounded in goals and reviews
H2 calibration · OperationsFairness check
Summary

Ratings are broadly consistent. One manager rates noticeably higher than the session, and one rating looks out of line with goal results.

Manager consistencyPieter V. rates 0.7 above the session average
Review
OutlierAisha K. rated 2 with 90% of goals achieved
Review
Demographic checkNo notable differences found in this session
Clear
Suggested adjustment · Aisha K.

Rating 2 → 3. Goal evidence and peer feedback point to solid performance. The written review focuses on one missed deadline.

ApplyKeep 2

Assistance in workflows

Help writing the case. Not deciding it.

In promotions, AI can draft evidence from goals and feedback, flag criteria with little support and check language for vague or exaggerated claims. It prepares a neutral summary for the panel. It never scores readiness or ranks candidates.

  • Evidence drafts from existing records
  • Language and evidence-gap checks
  • Each use recorded on the case
Promotion case · Kwame O.Language check

Kwame went above and beyond on the billing migration and single-handedly doubled team output. He now runs the weekly incident review and mentors two junior engineers.

Vague“Went above and beyond”: say what he did
Unsupported“Doubled team output”: no linked evidence
Evidence gap

Influences beyond the team. Little supporting evidence in goals, feedback or recognition.

Suggestions only. Each use is recorded on the case.

From signal to conversation

A risk spotted in March. A conversation that same week.

An illustrative engineering team at a 480-person company. The aim is a better conversation, not a prediction that comes true.

  1. Mon
    October

    A flight-risk prediction run scores Thandi at 68, high risk. The top factors are below-market pay, no raise in 22 months and a recent manager change.

  2. Mon
    October

    Creates a manager alert and a stay-interview prompt for her manager, due in 14 days. The HR business partner sees both on the interventions list.

  3. Wed 16:00
    Manager

    Opens the prep brief for Thursday’s 1:1. It suggests talking points and flags an action he still owes her from last time.

  4. Thu 10:30
    Manager

    Holds the conversation. The recap captures her interest in a certification and a question about pay.

  5. Following week
    HR business partner

    Reviews her pay against the band ahead of the compensation cycle, then marks the intervention complete.

Prep for upcoming 1:1 · Thandi M.Thursday 10:00
Stay interview dueLast 1:1: 5 weeks ago
Talking points
  • How the move to the new team is going since the manager change.
  • Recognise the billing migration, which shipped on time.
  • Follow up on her request for a certification budget.
Open action from last 1:1Share the platform roadmap draft
Overdue

Less guessing. Earlier conversations.

How it works

Useful from the data you already have.

  1. 1

    Bring people data together

    Records, reviews, goals, 1:1s, recognition and leave live in October People, so AI works from the same picture HR sees.

  2. 2

    Choose what to switch on

    Turn on the AI features that suit your organisation. Access follows each person’s role.

  3. 3

    Review and act

    Read the reasoning behind each signal or suggestion, then decide what happens next. Nothing changes without a person.

Human oversight

AI suggests. People decide.

  • Reasons, not just scores

    Flight-risk scores, calibration checks and suggestions show the factors and evidence behind them.

  • No automatic outcomes

    AI never makes a rating, promotion or pay decision. Suggestions wait for a person to apply or ignore them.

  • Recorded and switchable

    AI use on promotion cases is recorded for the audit trail, and AI features can be turned off for your organisation.

  • Governed models

    Models are listed in October’s published register, and customer data is never used to train them.

Inside ai assistance & insights

Made for the work
behind the moment.

Explore the workflows, tools and practical details that support ai assistance throughout the working day.

01 / Nudges & the AI assistant

Proactive manager recommendations.

Timely, contextual nudges: "Schedule a check-in with Sarah." "James hasn't received feedback in 30 days." "Team morale is trending down." Recognition gaps, overdue 1:1s and engagement dips reach managers in time, and an AI assistant answers any question about the platform.

  • Overdue 1:1s and recognition gaps
  • Engagement and morale shifts
  • Workload and meeting load
  • AI assistant on every page
02 / Career coach

Personalised growth at scale.

An AI career coach helps every employee explore trajectories, identify skill gaps and build development plans tailored to their ambitions.

  • Skill gap analysis
  • Learning-path suggestions
  • Goal tracking
  • Conversational coaching
03 / Talent intelligence

Who's ready. Who's at risk.

An AI high-potential score built from performance, potential, learning, goals and growth. Succession readiness scoring, what-if vacancy simulations and machine-learning flight-risk predictions with explainability.

  • AI HiPo score out of 100
  • Readiness scoring for successors
  • Flight risk with confidence levels
  • What-if simulations
04 / Cara and AI screening

Recruiting that never sleeps.

Cara sources and scores candidates and starts the outreach. AI screens applications against your criteria, runs voice interviews and reports how well its recommendations matched hiring outcomes.

  • Cara sourcing agent
  • AI screening and scoring
  • AI voice interviews
  • Structured evaluation criteria
05 / Meeting transcription & generative HR

Capture what matters. Write what's needed.

AI transcribes 1:1s and key meetings, extracts action items and analyses sentiment over time. Generate goals, job descriptions, policies and announcements from a sentence. Personality insights add work-style context to assessments.

  • 1:1 transcription and action items
  • Sentiment over time
  • Generate with AI for goals, JDs and policies
  • Personality insights
Intelligence inside the workflow

Governed by design

Named purpose, access controls and human oversight for every model.

Published register

Every model, purpose and control listed in the October model register.

Explore October’s AI governance
The full picture

There’s more
inside.

Explore the detail behind ai assistance.

Where AI lives+
  • Career coach
  • 1:1 intelligence
  • Manager insight
  • Meeting insights
  • Generate with AI
  • Who to recognise
  • Cara agent
  • AI context for recruiting
  • Personality insights
  • Survey pattern detection
  • Attrition forecasting
Keep the story moving
Next, explore coaching & 1:1s

A good conversation.
A useful next step.

Explore performance & growth
AI assistance & insights2 answers

Questions,
answered.

How does AI use employee data?

AI works inside governed workflows with access controls, named purpose and human oversight. Customer data is never used to train models. October publishes its model register, governance policy and evaluation results.

Can we turn specific AI features off?

Yes. Each AI capability can be enabled or disabled per organisation, and outputs are always reviewable by a person before they become a decision.

Start with your organisation

See AI assistance in your working day.

We’ll walk through the real product with your team and show how it connects to the rest of October People.