Cara builds take-home exercises with a weighted rubric, and technical assessments end with a spoken follow-up about the candidate’s own work. Your team scores blind, with Cara’s read as a second opinion.
Take our pricing page and design a clearer way for teams to choose a plan. Share your thinking as much as the screens.
Cara’s read against the rubric. Strong visual craft and good use of existing components. The trade-offs behind the new tiers are less clear. A second opinion for your team, not a decision.
| Problem | Visual | Design-system | Communication | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Morgan | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| Priya Naidoo | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Tom Becker | 2 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
Answer a few quick questions and Cara drafts the brief, deliverables and a rubric weighted out of 100. Ask Cara to change anything in plain words, then reuse the exercise across roles.
Candidates submit files and links through a portal with no login, with the effort and deadline shown up front. Reviewers score blind before seeing anyone else’s scores, and big disagreements are flagged.
Technical assessments generate a unique, open-book task for each candidate. Cara then holds a voice conversation about their submission, so a comprehension gap shows up even when the work looks strong.
No. Cara’s rubric review is a second opinion for your team, not a decision. The overall score is calculated from your rubric weights, and your reviewers score independently.
Technical assessments are open book. The spoken follow-up checks whether the candidate understands and can explain what they submitted.
Send an exercise from a candidate’s profile, or send it automatically when candidates reach a pipeline stage. Schedule the walkthrough interview from the review when you’re ready.
Bring a role you’re hiring for. Follow the whole journey in a demo.
See recruitment in actionDownload brochure Explore all of October People