October
Request a demo
All testingAssessment date: See assessment report
Luna · Ash · Ivy

Independent Penetration Testing

Independent testing covering prompt injection, jailbreak attempts, data exfiltration and attempts to extract system instructions.

01 · Published resultAssessor evidence
ExternalAssessor evidence
Separate security assessment

Independent security assessment evidence

Penetration testing is a separate third-party assessment of the AI and application boundary. The September automated model evaluation does not renew that assessment. Consult the Trust Centre for the available report's date, scope, results and remediation status.

External
Assessment process
Trust Centre
Evidence access
02 · What this evaluatesDefined scope

Attack the boundary, not a demo.

Testing covers prompt injection, jailbreak attempts, cross-user data access, exfiltration paths and instruction extraction across the deployed application boundary.

Because detailed findings could help an attacker, the public record reports scope and status while controlled evidence is available through the October Trust Centre.

Prompt injectionJailbreakData exfiltrationSystem promptsAccess controls
Test parameters

Accredited third-party provider · application and AI boundary · annual assessment

03 · Assessment scopeExternal evidence
CategoryCoverageCadenceOwnerEvidence
AI application boundary
As assessedSee report dateIndependent assessorTrust Centre
Remediation
As reportedSee statusSecurity ownerControlled evidence
04 · InterpretationLimits included

What the result says—and what it does not.

  • The automated model rerun does not establish a new penetration-testing pass or validate the current gateway's security boundary.
  • Testing is performed independently from the product team.
  • Findings receive a named owner, severity, target date and closure evidence.
  • Customers can request the available assurance material from the Trust Centre.
Important limitation

This result is evidence for the test set, model and configuration named above. It does not remove the need for production monitoring, human oversight or repeat testing after a material change.

05 · Ongoing controlReview and retesting

A result is only useful while it stays current.

Security evidence should be useful without making the system easier to attack. Detailed reports are shared through controlled assurance channels.

Next step

Responsible AI is a continuous practice.

Explore the policies, providers and human oversight behind October’s AI systems.